It's a hypothetical way for a black hole to very slowly give back all of the matter and energy it's consumed in the form of particle radiation. So Hawking came up with the idea of Hawking radiation. It's generally conserved in the same way, but black holes appear to destroy matter, energy, and information in a way that doesn't really add up. The real crux of the matter is that we're starting to understand that information is a lot like energy. You left a mark on the surface and it emits a corresponding pattern of radiation. It's pretty much the same as dropping a rock onto a planet and observing the crater from orbit. That snapshot is etched into the "surface" of the horizon and emits a pattern of radiation that corresponds to it. Think of it as a snapshot of an object as it crosses the event horizon. Light and radio are radiation.īut I think you're overcomplicating it. Information encoded in radiation is how we get pretty much all of the information we have about the universe. Maybe the foundation of existence is continuous and infinitely scaled, and it's only our own emulation of that foundation where there's conversion to discrete units and fundamental limits preventing any 'real' infinites? We've now seen that paradigm with procedural generated environments with deformable geometry where continuous seed functions convert to voxels that are tracked. My sense is that we've got it flipped, and have so strongly embraced the 'realism' of quanta that we intuitively reject some of the more continuous features of GR, whereas if I was putting forward the candidate for the secondary 'rendering' side effect, it would be the conversation of continuous modeled things to discrete units for tracking state from interactions with free agents so optimized that erasing persistent information about the interactions converts back from discrete to continuous. One of the newer theories around the information paradox is that the information 'lost' is actually encoded in the Hawking radiation released, and with the proper key to decode it one could theoretically peer inside the black hole.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |